OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ON HEALTH CARE

I am sitting here and suddenly on my TV appears a Live shot of the LIAR "Nancy Pelosi on TV talking about the health care reform bill now before congress. Both houses.

Obama will be on TV tonight talking about healthcare.

Neither Obama or our entire congress have no clue about health care.
Obama has no clue what the 535 jerk offs in congress have even put in this bill they are trying shove down our throats. What does the bill have it. Obama has no clue , he has not read it. Who reads any of the bills they sign into law. No one.

They had some women talking about her cervical cancer. She has no clue about what the Nelasta shot was for. SHE LIED...SHE SAID IT WAS FOR Nausea. It is actually to keep your white blood cells from getting to low because chemo does that to your blood and you don't have the ability to fight off infection. It is "not" for Nausea.

She said a Nelasta shot after you have Chemo cost 6,000.00. That is a blantent LIE. The shot cost around 3,000.00. I had the shot. My insurance did not want to pay for it either, and I was going to have to take a different shot everyday for 6 days in a row that was cheaper that required me to have to go to the hospital everyday and get it. When you do chemo you feel weak and terrible and you are nto able to get up everyday and go and get this cheaper series of shots. I call the company that makes the drug. I was approved for the drug and the company sends the Dr. a vile of replacement for their inventory when they give it to you. You only have to have the Neulasta shot on time the day after your chemo.
I know. Been there done that.

http://www.neulasta.com/?wt.srch=1

If the government takes over the healtcare in this country then we will all be screwed.

Nancy Pelosi would sell her mother for a vote, a real piece of slime.

Chaos, arm-twisting gave Pelosi win

After lawmakers had devoured the last of the Kalua Pig at last Thursday night’s White House Luau, Nancy Pelosi summoned her team back to the Capitol — to ensure the climate change bill wasn’t the next thing roasted on the spit.

Pelosi and her top lieutenants would spend the next four hours whipping, cajoling, begging and browbeating undecided Democrats — and triple-checking their whip lists to decide who was a solid “yes” and who was prevaricating on the cap-and-trade legislation.

Yet no matter how many calls they made — or how many times they checked and rechecked their list — Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) kept coming up between 12 and 20 votes short of the 216 votes needed to win.

“We didn’t have the votes — and we had to have this vote,” said a leadership aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “This was the big one for us. [Pelosi] staked her prestige on this one. ... This was her flagship issue, and this was a flagship vote for us.”

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 passed by only 219-212, after an epic day replete with Republican ambushes, petty betrayals, hastily rearranged flights and disappearing acts.

Yet for all the apparent chaos, the action was commanded by a House speaker maneuvering with the urgency of someone who knew her reputation was on the line.

Despite Republican promises to punish battleground state Democrats for supporting a “cap and tax” plan, Pelosi and her fractious caucus passed their most serious test to date.

And whatever the fallout, aides say that both Pelosi and President Barack Obama now know that their majority can hold together — barely — when placed under withering pressure — which may bode well for the equally arduous trials on health care reform.

At the end of it all, Pelosi, who floated in and out of the House cloakroom all day, impossible to miss in an arctic-white linen pantsuit, gambled big and pulled off one of the most important legislative victories of her career, a win she views as a personal vindication, according to those close to the San Francisco Democrat.

“There’s no question about it,” Clyburn said after the vote. “She went back to her whipping days of old. She is an incredibly good whip. I’m trying to learn from her every day.”

Despite the most coordinated push yet between Democrats on the Hill and the Obama White House, the outcome was not certain until the very end, according to two dozen aides and members of Congress interviewed by POLITICO.

“It was really never a solid [216],” one person said afterward.

Party leaders agreed to bring the bill to the floor during a meeting Monday night, even though some of the members present had reservations about forcing vulnerable Democrats to cast votes on a package that may not go anywhere in the Senate.

In the days leading up the vote, the number of Democratic “yes” votes was locked at 200, according to people familiar with the tally. Every time they’d pick up one vote, another would slip. Democratic leaders needed a cushion to help protect the most vulnerable among them, and they didn’t have it.

As the frustration grew, an aide joked in one meeting that White House staff should give fence-sitters the same colored leis so that the president and his Cabinet secretaries would know who to buttonhole. The desperation was such that others in the room paused for a split second to consider the joke before abandoning it as a logistical impossibility.

During the luau, Clyburn set up shop in the Oval Office with Obama to meet with wavering Democrats, like freshmen Reps. Frank Kratovil Jr. of Maryland and Eric Massa of New York. Members of Clyburn’s whip team patrolled the White House lawn, cornering colleagues and making the case for the bill.

As the week wore on, Pelosi was directing former Vice President Al Gore whom to call, but everyone decided late Wednesday night that the list of undecided members was small enough that he should stay in Nashville, Tenn., to make calls.

On the day of the vote, the bleary-eyed tag team of Pelosi and Clyburn camped out in the cloakroom, just off the House floor, for nearly three hours.

One of Pelosi’s first targets was Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.), a key fence-sitter who wanted more money generated from the carbon trading to be directed to the research and development of green technology.

Pelosi talked to him again and again, but he wouldn’t budge. Her message to him was the same as it was to others: It wasn’t worth voting against the bill because of what wasn’t in it.

According to witnesses, Pelosi perched herself on the arm of Holt’s chair and went nose to nose with him for a half-hour warning him that his no vote could scuttle the entire climate change effort — and that liberals would have another chance to make their case once the bill came back from the Senate.

Around 2 o’clock, he became a “yes.”

Next up was Austin, Texas, liberal Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who had seemed to be leaning toward the bill during a Thursday night visit with Obama in the Oval Office — but then infuriated the White House midday Friday by declaring the measure too weak on polluters to win his vote.

An exasperated White House staffer told POLITICO it was “stunning that he would ignore the wishes not just of his president but of his constituents and the country.”

Then Pelosi began working Doggett as the two stood in the back of the chamber near the railing, making the same perfect-is-enemy-of-the-good argument she had used against Holt. Doggett ended up voting “yes.”During the vote, Washington Rep. Jay Inslee, one of the taller members of the House, guarded the doors on the floor leading out to the Speaker’s Lobby, warning members not to leave the floor in case anyone needed to switch his or her vote. But that didn’t stop some Democrats, like Colorado Rep. John Salazar, from voting no early and sneaking out to avoid getting pressured by party leaders.

Leadership aides say Texas Rep. Ciro Rodriguez promised Pelosi he’d vote yes, but voted no and sprinted from the chamber. California Rep. Xavier Becerra tried unsuccessfully to flag him on his cell phone — and Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) bounded into the ornate Speaker’s Lobby off the floor shouting, “Rodriguez! Rodriguez!” as puzzled reporters looked on.

Pelosi forced members to postpone their trips abroad to stay in town for the vote, aides familiar with the situation said. At one point, she even promised to escort one member out to the airport in her motorcade to catch an early flight — as House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) stalled the proceedings with an hourlong reading from the 300-page manager’s amendment.

California Rep. Ellen Tauscher, a master of floor procedure who left the House on Friday to take a top job at the State Department, may have made the biggest personal sacrifice by postponing a dinner the night before her wedding to preside over the debate — her last as a member of Congress.

When another Californian, Rep. Joe Baca, declared himself undeclared, Pelosi and her whip team surrounded him — and burst out into applause when he cast one of the decisive “yes” votes, according to an eyewitness.

Members who wanted to be spared of the Pelosi treatment — slinked in and out of the chamber hoping the speaker wouldn’t notice them.

Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) — another progressive who didn’t think the bill was strong enough — was an especially elusive target, according to leadership aides. Pelosi’s attempts to contact Filner early Friday weren’t successful, staffers say, but she began lobbying him furiously when he showed up for a series of procedural votes leading up to the fateful climate change measure.

After Baca and others had cast their “yeas,” the speaker walked up to Filner and calmly said, “It’s now your time to be on the record, Mr. Filner,” according to a witness.

He voted yes.

HEY CHINA ! TELL PELOSI AND HER GANG HELL NO TO CAP AND TRADE !

Wheeee ....what do you think about me now. I am all dressed up like a big girl. I have had so much botox that I don't look to bad today as a 70 year old brain dead idiot, Now do I ?













Nancy Pelosi the "LIAR" that accused the CIA of being Liars,and will not retrack what she said has snuck off to China to drum up support for the CAP AND TRADE TAX BILL and she took John Scarry Kerry with her among others. She will be trying to get them to sign on to charging their folks more money for these services so Americans want feel as though they are having to pay while no other countries sign on to Al Gores BullShit ! She knows it is going to be a hard sell and as it is right now the house and the senate are not on board with the bill. Lets hope and pray they stay that way.
IT WILL COST ALL AMERICANS MONEY OUT THE YING YANG FOR ALL ENERGY THEY USE, WHETHER IT BE ELECTRICITY, GAS FOR YOUR CAR, HEATING OIL, ETC.ETC.
Every time you use "anything", buy anything, it will cost you a lot more. Every single company that uses energy of any kind what so ever will have to pay more for that energy. The cost will be passed on to the consumer. What a sad time for AMERICA right now with all these socilaist/communist running this country. I hope we can survive for 4 years.

The many nasty pictures of NANCY,a terribly disturbed women that drank too much of the Kool aid.























Speaker Pelosi visits China; protesters seek help

Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, meets with Han Zheng, Shanghai's mayor, unseen, in Shanghai, China, on Monday, May 25, 2009. U.S. House Speaker Pelosi, long a fierce critic of Beijing, toured China's financial center of Shanghai on Monday on a visit meant to highlight common goals in promoting clean energy to fight climate change.

SHANGHAI (AP) - U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, long a fierce critic of Beijing, toured China's financial capital on Monday on a visit focused on environmental issues rather than human rights, though her presence emboldened protesters.
Pelosi took a low-key approach as she prepared for meetings in Beijing just days ahead of the 20th anniversary of the 1989 crackdown on the Tiananmen Square democracy protests.

The apparent shift approach dovetails with President Barack Obama's new emphasis on engagement with Beijing, rather than confrontation over its human rights record. Visits by Pelosi and other senior U.S. figures have been aimed at highlighting cooperation between the two countries on a slew of issues.

Still, the leading Democratic lawmaker's reputation as a strong human rights defender galvanized petitioners in Beijing, where several hundreds gathered Monday morning near the capital's South Railway Station to air their grievances. Dozens of police stood guard and most protesters were kept behind police lines.

While many complaints were about individual cases, photos posted on the Chinese-language Web site Boxun.com, a U.S.-hosted Web site banned in China, showed one group of demonstrators holding up a black-and-white cloth banner that said: "Welcome Pelosi. Pay close attention to human rights. SOS."

Speaking to U.S. business figures Monday in Shanghai, Pelosi noted her commitment to human rights issues over the years.

During a 1991 visit to Beijing, the Democrat from California unfurled a banner that read "To those who died for democracy in China" in the square. Years later, she attempted to present human rights petitions to then-visiting President Hu Jintao. When Tibetans staged protests against Chinese rule last year, Pelosi visited their exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.

"I will continue to speak out for human rights in China and around the world," Pelosi told members of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai.

"Indeed, protecting the environment is a human rights issue," she said according to a copy of the speech distributed to journalists. "We hope to send a clear message that transparency, accountability, enforcement, and respect for the rule of law are essential if we are to protect our planet," she added.

Pelosi did castigate North Korea after Pyongyang announced that it had successfully carried out an underground nuclear test, weeks after threatening to restart its rogue atomic program.

"If today's announcement is true, these tests would be a clear violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718, which requires that North Korea not conduct any further nuclear tests. Such action by North Korea is unacceptable and cause for great alarm," Pelosi said in a written statement.

Pelosi said she and other members of her delegation planned to urge Chinese leaders to use their influence to get the North to return to six-nation talks aimed at ending its nuclear program.

The lawmaker arrived over the weekend accompanied by a delegation of four Democrats and one Republican, all members of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. The main focus of their visit is the shared goal of promoting clean energy and combatting climate change.

Pelosi met Monday with Shanghai Mayor Han Zheng. The two exchanged pleasantries but made no substantive remarks before reporters. The delegation will later meet in Beijing with Hu and other leaders.

U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman and Democrat Sen. John Kerry is also in China, and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will arrive next week. He is expected to reassure Beijing about the strength of the U.S. dollar and thus the value of China's vast holdings of U.S. Treasury notes.

NANCY PELOSI TELLS ANOTHER WHOPPER OF A LIE~ACCUSES CIA OF LYING

TODAY, NANCY PELOSI ACCUSED THE CIA OF LYING. What a whopper. Bring on the truth commission. Nancy you are toast. You are a lair and a scumbag and you would sell your mother for a vote. You are going down Botox Queen.










CIA Proves Pelosi Lied

Nancy Pelosi has been caught in yet another lie. She has claimed that she was never told about "harsh interrogation" methods used on terrorist combatants. But she was told about it. The thought of a Democrat lying might shock two or three of you, but to many of us this is just more of the same.

The Washington Post:

Intelligence officials released documents this evening saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was briefed in September 2002 about the use of harsh interrogation tactics against al-Qaeda prisoners, seemingly contradicting her repeated statements over the past 18 months that she was never told that these techniques were actually being used.

So, Pelosi knew about the interrogation methods well over six years ago but said nothing until it served her politically to say something. In other words, Democrat Pelosi was enabling the Bush Administration, apparently having no problem with the methods that she was told about. Only when it seemed politically expedient did she begin to criticize the methods.

This is reminiscent of other Democrat lies concerning the general subject of the war on terror. Democrat "leaders" who given full briefings before and after the invasion of Iraq publicly pretended that the knew nothing. Democrat leaders act like Sergeant Schultz in Hogan's Heroes, the bumbling, cowardly German prison guard who pretended to "know nothing" even when he did.

Republicans have accused her of knowing for many years precisely the techniques CIA agents were using in interrogations, and only protesting the tactics when they became public and liberal antiwar activists protested. Full Story at The Washington Post...

Nancy Pelosi has proven again and again that she is little more than an opportunity whore, an ideoligically vapid husk of a woman. For Nancy Pelosi, her own political career is more important than any true political beliefs. We can respect someone for their heartfelt politics, if they are sincere and not hypocritical. Nancy Pelosi is insincere, hypocritical, and should resign for the good of both the nation and her own party.

CIA Proves Pelosi Lied
Nancy Pelosi has been caught in yet another lie. She has claimed that she was never told about "harsh interrogation" methods used on terrorist combatants. But she was told about it. The thought of a Democrat lying might shock two or three of you, but to many of us this is just more of the same.The Washington Post:Intelligence officials released documents this evening saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was briefed in September 2002 about the use of harsh interrogation tactics against al-Qaeda prisoners, seemingly contradicting her repeated statements over the past 18 months that she was never told that these techniques were actually being used.So, Pelosi knew about the interrogation methods well over six years ago but said nothing until it served her politically to say something. In other words, Democrat Pelosi was enabling the Bush Administration, apparently having no problem with the methods that she was told about. Only when it seemed politically expedient did she begin to criticize the methods.This is reminiscent of other Democrat lies concerning the general subject of the war on terror. Democrat "leaders" who given full briefings before and after the invasion of Iraq publicly pretended that the knew nothing. Democrat leaders act like Sergeant Schultz in Hogan's Heroes, the bumbling, cowardly German prison guard who pretended to "know nothing" even when he did.Republicans have accused her of knowing for many years precisely the techniques CIA agents were using in interrogations, and only protesting the tactics when they became public and liberal antiwar activists protested. Full Story at The Washington Post...Nancy Pelosi has proven again and again that she is little more than an opportunity whore, an ideoligically vapid husk of a woman. For Nancy Pelosi, her own political career is more important than any true political beliefs. We can respect someone for their heartfelt politics, if they are sincere and not hypocritical. Nancy Pelosi is insincere, hypocritical, and should resign for the good of both the nation and her own party.

NANCY PELOSI IS A BALD FACE LIAR ! RESIGN NANCY NOW !

Nancy, It sure is getting deep up there in Washington these days. Have you given out rubber boots so your other cohorts and thieves can come to work without falling in all the BS you people come up with everyday. You are a disgrace to America. RESIGN NOW !










CIA Says Pelosi Was Briefed on Use of 'Enhanced Interrogations'
By Paul Kane
Intelligence officials released documents this evening saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was briefed in September 2002 about the use of harsh interrogation tactics against al-Qaeda prisoners, seemingly contradicting her repeated statements over the past 18 months that she was never told that these techniques were actually being used.

In a 10-page memo outlining an almost seven-year history of classified briefings, intelligence officials said that Pelosi and then-Rep. Porter Goss (R-Fla.) were the first two members of Congress ever briefed on the interrogation tactics. Then the ranking member and chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, respectively, Pelosi and Goss were briefed Sept. 4, 2002, one week before the first anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The memo, issued by the Director of National Intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency to Capitol Hill, notes the Pelosi-Goss briefing covered "EITs including the use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah." EIT is an acronym for enhanced interrogation technique. Zubaydah was one of the earliest valuable al-Qaeda members captured and the first to have the controversial tactic known as water boarding used against him.

The issue of what Pelosi knew and when she knew it has become a matter of heated debate on Capitol Hill. Republicans have accused her of knowing for many years precisely the techniques CIA agents were using in interrogations, and only protesting the tactics when they became public and liberal antiwar activists protested.

In a carefully worded statement, Pelosi's office said today that she had never been briefed about the use of waterboarding, only that it had been approved by Bush administration lawyers as a legal technique to use in interrogations.

"As this document shows, the Speaker was briefed only once, in September 2002. The briefers described these techniques, said they were legal, but said that waterboarding had not yet been used," said Brendan Daly, Pelosi's spokesman.

Pelosi's statement did not address whether she was informed that other harsh techniques were already in use during the Zubaydah interrogations.

In December 2007 the Washington Post reported that leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees had been briefed in the fall of 2002 about waterboarding -- which simulates drowning -- and other techniques, and that no congressional leaders protested its use. At the time Pelosi said she was not told that waterboarding was being used, a position she stood by repeatedly last month when the Bush-era Justice Department legal documents justifying the interrogation tactics were released by Attorney General Eric Holder.

The new memo shows that intelligence officials were willing to share the information about waterboarding with only a sharply closed group of people. Three years after the initial Pelosi-Goss briefing, Bush officials still limited interrogation technique briefings to just the chairman and ranking member of the House and Senate intelligence committees, the so-called Gang of Four in the intelligence world.

In October 2005, CIA officials began briefing other congressional leaders with oversight of the intelligence community, including top appropriators who provided the agency its annual funding. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam and an opponent of torture techniques, was also read into the program at that time even though he did not hold a special committee position overseeing the intelligence community.

A bipartisan collection of lawmakers have criticized the practice of limiting information to just the "Gang of Four", who were expressly forbidden from talking about the information from other colleagues, including fellow members of the intelligence committees. Pelosi and others are considering reforms that would assure a more open process for all committee members.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/05/cia_says_pelosi_was_briefed_on.html

Madame Botox is the phoniest bastard on Capitol Hill since, well (insert democrat politician name here). Of course she knew about waterboarding, but as we all know, pressure from code pink is a son of a gun. I'm sure the "House Ethics Committee", (is that rich or what?) will get right on a thorough investigation of the botox queen, after they finish up their current work on Chuck Rangel..Ultimately, it's all just a smokescreen for ramming cap and tax into oblivion, and socialized healthcare down our throats.

Obama, Why are you screwing us ?

Hey Bud, Why don't you tell these scumbags that you are catering to GO TO HELL. All you have done since you have been in Office is APPEASE ALL THE PEOPLE YOU SUCKERED INTO GIVING YOU MONEY FOR YOUR CAMPAIGN. MOVEON.ORG, DAILYKOS, GEORGE SORUS, AL GORE, THE BIG AUTO UNIONS, AND OTHER ALL THE OTHER UNIONS AND I COULD GO ON AND ON. Why don't you come down of that HIGH you are on and do the right thing for this country. Are you really that screwed up ? Has all that pot and cocaine you did still got a hold on you. There is always....REHAB.

DEMOCRATS WE HAVE YOUR NUMBER~Hope of the Wicked: Master Plan to Rule the World

Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the world
Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the world






Ted Flynn's book, 'Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World,' will open your eyes to the greatest deception in modern history. It explores the convergence on a global basis of multinational corporations, foundations and the political and sociological instruments of a one-world government to bring about a New World Order. The book is 550 pages with 82 photographs and 1,200 footnotes, with a strong historical basis to show that there is a global elite working to end the sovereignty of nations, to place all under the United Nations.

In this well-documented book, readers will learn the following:
* Is there a conspiracy to rule the world?
* What is the plan to bring America into a one-world order?
* Hundred of quotes from world leaders
* The utopian dream of the United Nations
* The long tentacles of the United Nations in your life
* World taxes and a world court for world citizens
* What is the Federal Reserve and who owns it?
* The links of world businesses, foundations and governments
* What are the Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission?
* What are the authority and mission of FEMA?
* What is the role of the New Age movement and environmentalism in a world religion?
* The erosion of rights, freedom and national sovereignty
* The need to create chaos to usher in a new world order
* The subversion of the Constitution by Executive Order
* What is the real agenda of secret societies? Technology's theft of privacy: chips, satellites and tracking
* Is artificial weather modification real?
* Who was the most influential woman of the 20th Century?
* Who are the world players trying to bring change?
* Pulling the plug on the world economy - nearer than you may think
* How will the global elite's plans affect you and your family in the near future?

The New World Order is not coming - it is here with a vengeance!

Paperback. 550 pages. List $21.95

I am not trying to sell any books for anyone but I am just trying to make people understand what is REALLY GOING ON in the WORLD TODAY. IF YOU ARE NOT INFORMED YOU WANT KNOW WHY THINGS ARE HAPPENING.
http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=40

ARE YOU KIDDING ME ? NANCY PELOSI IS A HYPOCRITE!

YOU HAVE GO TO BE KIDDING ME. Congress and NANCY PELOSI PUKE FACE (HYPOCRITE) HAS THE DAMN NERVE TO TALK ABOUT AGI AND OTHERS SQUANDERING THE PEOPLE'S MONEY.
WHAT THE F ! YOU PIECES OF TRASH JUST PASSED BILLS SPENDING TRILLIONS OF THE PEOPLES MONEY ON YOU PET PROJECTS AND YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO SAY THIS. GIVE ME A BREAK. YOU LYING PIECE OF GARBAGE. RESIGN NOW ! ALL OF YOU CREEPS. TAX CHEATS LIARS AND PURE SCUM OF THE EARTH ARE RUNNING AMERICA AMUCK.

AGI, FANNIE MAE, AND FREDDIE MAC AND ALL THE REST OF THE CHEATS ON WALL STREET ARE ANGELS COMPARED TO WHAT THE HELL YOU PEOPLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS ARE DOING TO AMERICANS. CLEAN UP YOUR OWN YARD BEFORE YOU GO CLEANING UP SOMEONES ELSES !



WASHINGTON (AP) -- Denouncing a "squandering of the people's money," lawmakers voted decisively Thursday to impose a 90 percent tax on millions of dollars in employee bonuses paid by troubled insurance giant AIG and other bailed-out companies.
Those people are good folks compared to all of you liars and tax cheats running our goverenment now. AMERICA HAS NO MORALS ANYMORE. WHY ?? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON ?

NANCY PELOSI NEEDS TO BE IN JAIL ! LOCK HER UP NOW !

NANCY TELLS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS THAT THE LAW MEANS NOTHING. WHAT A TRAITOR. SHE SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON.



Pelosi Tells Illegal Immigrants That Work Site Raids are Un-American
EXCLUSIVE: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently told a group of both legal and illegal immigrants and their families that enforcement of existing immigration laws, as currently practiced, is "un-American." The speaker, condemning raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, referred to the immigrants she was addressing as "very, very patriotic." "Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?" Pelosi told a mostly Hispanic gathering at St. Anthony's Church in San Francisco.

Pelosi Tells Illegal Immigrants That Work Site Raids are Un-American
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently told a group of both legal and illegal immigrants and their families that enforcement of existing immigration laws, as currently practiced, is "un-American."

The speaker, condemning raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, referred to the immigrants she was addressing as "very, very patriotic."

"Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?" Pelosi told a mostly Hispanic gathering at St. Anthony's Church in San Francisco.

"It must be stopped....What value system is that? I think it's un-American. I think it's un-American."

Pelosi said she was invited to the church by Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., as part of his 17-city, cross-country tour called United Families, which he says is intended to put a human face on the immigration debate.

"We think that families are the cornerstone of our society and our nation, and an immigration system should preserve those families, not destroy them," Gutierrez told FOX News Capitol Hill Producer Chad Pergram on Tuesday.

The congressman is collecting petitions that ask President Obama to "stop the immigration raids and deportations that are tearing our marriages, families and children apart." He is expected to present those petitions when Hispanic members of Congress meet with the President Wednesday.

On Saturday night, Pelosi joined Gutierrez before a cheering crowd at St. Anthony's chanting, "Si se puede," or "Yes we can."

Referring to work site enforcement actions by ICE agents, Pelosi said, "We have to have a change in policy and practice and again ... I can't say enough, the raids must end. The raids must end.

"You are special people. You're here on a Saturday night to take responsibility for our country's future. That makes you very, very patriotic."

"I was embarrassed by what she said," said Rick Oltman, with Californians for Population Stabilization, an anti-illegal immigrant group. "Exhorting illegal aliens for taking responsibility for our country's future.... In fact, sitting there in the audience.... I really resented that comment."

"I think it was pandering to the crowd but also insulting to American citizens who consider themselves to be patriotic, who obey the rule of law," said Oltman, who shot a video of the rally.

COMMENTS ON THIS WEBSITE....
From fredrickson - 19 Mar 2009 @ 11:32 am
In Reply to AmericanPatriot: I told her and I quote "It is obvious that your loyalties lie south of our border so why don't you pick your posterior up and move to Mexico. You are despised and hated by many in the USA. In short YOU SUCK". signed a Pissed off Citizen.


From fredrickson - 19 Mar 2009 @ 03:20 am
Barbara (the hound) Boxer is just as bad.
From AmericanPatriot - 18 Mar 2009 @ 11:19 pm
Here is a copy of the email I sent her:

You are the most vile and treacherous traitor in American history.

Your pandering to illegal alien invaders from Mexico is grounds for charges of treason to be brought against you.

Remember, it's a felony to "aid an abet" an illegal alien!

Here is the link to send her an email if any one cares to let her know what real Americans think about her.

URL Link
From AmericanPatriot - 18 Mar 2009 @ 10:57 pm
In Reply to cudzuqueen:

Well said!

I would add that the b i t c h should be dropped out in Mexico where she thinks her constituents are. She and the rest of the open borders traitors are counting on the illegal aliens who get amnesty to keep them in office forever.

Unfortunately, that is exactly what will happen if they push through the amnesty bill buried in the middle of some other innocuous bill. Remember, these morons do not READ the bills they pass!

We can count on Numbers to keep us informed when they try the next sneak attack.

American citizens are mad as hell and it's time to prepare for the next American Revolution!
From True Blue - 18 Mar 2009 @ 08:25 pm
She’s the one that’s un-American. These politicians do what they want in opposition to the American citizens’ wishes. It’s time to drag them to the streets and introduce them to a few guillotines. They’d have to custom fit one for fat Teddy to accommodate his three chins! But then they could also use it on Carl Rove's fat ass afterward. As more Americans lose jobs, they just might become enraged enough to see through these traitors and their savior NObama.
From kay - 18 Mar 2009 @ 08:19 pm
I saw the tape, and couldn't figure out who she was talking to. Either they had an interpreter, or cue cards prompting applause, because we know none of them speak English.
From yellowdaisy - 18 Mar 2009 @ 08:08 pm
She's a loser! I heard about this around 6pm CST while listening to Mark Levine....first time I have ever heard him on radio.....Wow......was he ever great at putting her where she belongs.....how un-American she is! TRAITOR!!!!!!
I think we will be hearing more about this.....I think she just committed policitical suicide with those remarks. Hope I can find the station that I was listening to again. Levine was great!!!....not sure I spelled his name right.
From fredrickson - 18 Mar 2009 @ 07:54 pm
In Reply to TXPatriot: One of these days she is going to bend over and when she stands back up she is going to have a goatee as a direct result of too many face lifts.
From honeybug36 - 18 Mar 2009 @ 07:02 pm
this is the reason i cant stand pelosi because she's always on the wrong side of any issue,and for her to say that these illegal alien criminals are special,what a laugh!i get so tired of our politions saying that we need these criminals.like hell we do they're nothing but a drain on our society.we all see it except of course pelosi who lives in her own world.god,i would love to get a hold of this woman and just strangle her
From TXPatriot - 18 Mar 2009 @ 06:29 pm
We all know what, or who, is un-American in this story.

It's the talking skull with lipstick and false teeth.
From bobinlasvegas - 18 Mar 2009 @ 05:43 pm
This government needs to be taken back from Pelosi, Gutierrez and the rest of the
UN - American criminals in Washington.

To bad someone didn’t stand up and slap her in the mouth and make her eat that microphone. It is not any concern and it certainly not the fault of the American People if and when an illegal is separated from his or her family, if anyone is to blame it is politicians like Pelosi and Gutierrez that that have encouraged the illegal to not only come, but to stay in this country. 90 % of the American People made it quit clear we don’t want the illegal in this country and we will not allow any type of amnesty

“The raids must stop,” she says, I say the American People should have raided that meeting; she needs to be taken out of office with a few less teeth in her stupid head. Pelosie is an embarrassment to herself, her race (yes I said race) and to the American People.

"Who in this country would not want to change a policy of kicking in doors in the middle of the night and sending a parent away from their families?"

To answer your question Nancy, The American People we want the illegal removed from this country by any and all means possible and we want it done now! If it takes the American People to do it, I think that’s precisely what should happen. How would she like it if the American People grew some backbone mobilized and did take over the job? There would be more than doors kicked in and the illegal would be separated their family and from this country permanently.

Apparently Pelosi and the rest of the criminals in Washington don’t know how fed up the American People are with talk like this? How fed up we are with un- American Congressman like Gutierrez who should be removed from office. How fed up we are with a President that we don’t even know what his real name is or were he came from the only thing we are sure of is, he is a know nothing do nothing clown, he is black and like Pelosi, Gutierrez and the rest of the criminals in Washington along with the illegals a black mark on the United States of America
From Country - 18 Mar 2009 @ 04:47 pm
"You are special people."


Special Ed is right, I guess people who have an IQ under 70 should be allowed in this country with john32useless.
From Phacorah - 18 Mar 2009 @ 03:31 pm
Perhaps if this broad loses her job to cheap labor illegal immigrant workers she'll change her mind. Maybe if her children weren't learning at the rate they should cause the school is trying to educate anchors of illegals, she'd change her tune. Or maybe, just maybe if she's raped by one-she's get it. This has to be the most obvious/accepted law breaking act I've ever seen. We know they are here, we can find them (EVerify/Residential Logs)-but we need to be humane and nice about it? Our four fathers would roll over in their graves for this "Un American" acceptance.
From cudzuqueen - 18 Mar 2009 @ 03:14 pm
In Reply to jack: Great to hear!!!!!
From jack - 18 Mar 2009 @ 02:55 pm
In Reply to cudzuqueen: dont worry there was a raid in my community last night.........It was great to watch
From john32us - 18 Mar 2009 @ 02:53 pm
She is all right, these raids needs to stop immediately!
From cudzuqueen - 18 Mar 2009 @ 02:04 pm
Funny, I'd say that using non-union workers at her vineyard, while favoring illegals is pretty anti-American. Preaching politics in a church filled with illegals is preposterous, and frankly, this teflon filled, bug-eyed &itch needs to be tarred, feathered and dropped out of her jumbo, non-refueling Air Force jet. How has she managed to pull off this outrage for so long?

Nancy Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds, $99,000

YEAH NANCY YOU ARE CROOK TOO ! BUT, HEY THATS OKAY, RIGHT ?.. YOU ARE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE ! LOL
APPARENTLY YOU TEED SOMEONE OFF NANCY AND DID NOT DO SOMETHING THEY ASKED YOU TO DO FOR THEM AND THEY GOT MAD AND EXPOSED YOU. POLITICS. THAT'S THE WAY IT IS NANCY. SORRY. LMAO







EXCLUSIVE:
Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees

Wednesday, October 1, 2008


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she supported banning last year.

Financial Leasing Services Inc. (FLS), owned by Paul F. Pelosi, has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's "PAC to the Future" over the PAC's nine-year history.

The payments have quadrupled since Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer of his wife's committee in 2007, Federal Election Commission records show. FLS is on track to take in $48,000 in payments this year alone - eight times as much as it received annually from 2000 to 2005, when the committee was run by another treasurer.

Lawmakers' frequent use of campaign donations to pay relatives emerged as an issue in the 2006 election campaigns, when the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal gave Democrats fodder to criticize Republicans such as former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas and Rep. John T. Doolittle of California for putting their wives on their campaign and PAC payrolls for fundraising work.

Last year, Mrs. Pelosi supported a bill that would have banned members of Congress from putting spouses on their campaign staffs. The bill - which passed the House in a voice vote but did not get out of a Senate committee - banned not only direct payments by congressional campaign committees and PACs to spouses for services including consulting and fundraising, but also "indirect compensation," such as payments to companies that employ spouses.

"Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time. "Congressman [Adam] Schiff's bill will help us accomplish that goal by increasing transparency in election campaigns and preventing the misuse of funds."

Last week, Mrs. Pelosi's office said the payments to her husband's firm were perfectly legal, insisting she is compensating her husband at fair market value for the work his firm has performed for the PAC. But ethical watchdogs said the arrangement sends the wrong message.

"It's problematic," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonprofit ethics and watchdog group. "From what I understand, Mr. Pelosi doesn't need the money, but this isn't the issue. ... As speaker of the House, it sends the wrong message. She shouldn't be putting family members on the payroll."

A senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi described the payments to FLS as "business expenses."

"Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time. "Congressman [Adam] Schiff's bill will help us accomplish that goal by increasing transparency in election campaigns and preventing the misuse of funds."

Last week, Mrs. Pelosi's office said the payments to her husband's firm were perfectly legal, insisting she is compensating her husband at fair market value for the work his firm has performed for the PAC. But ethical watchdogs said the arrangement sends the wrong message.

"It's problematic," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonprofit ethics and watchdog group. "From what I understand, Mr. Pelosi doesn't need the money, but this isn't the issue. ... As speaker of the House, it sends the wrong message. She shouldn't be putting family members on the payroll."

A senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi described the payments to FLS as "business expenses."

"She's followed all the appropriate rules and regulations in terms of records and paperwork," said Brendan Daly, Mrs. Pelosi's spokesman. "When [former treasurer] Leo McCarthy became ill, she thought that it was best that that firm did the accounting and she's paid fair market value in San Francisco."

Between 1999 and 2006, FLS collected $500 per month to cover rent, utilities and equipment for the leadership PAC, according to the FEC records. The PAC's address is listed as a personal mailbox in San Francisco, across the street from FLS's Montgomery Street office building, but the rent payments went to an office space.

In early 2007, the PAC's treasurer, Leo T. McCarthy, former Democratic speaker of the state assembly and lieutenant governor in California, died. Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer and his company's PAC payouts rose.

At that point, FLS started charging the PAC $24,000 per year for accounting work. In January 2008, the PAC's rent - paid to FLS - also quadrupled from $500 to $2,000 per month.

Katie Falkenberg/The Washington Times PARTNERSHIP: Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul F. Pelosi, was by her side at a Democratic event in 2006.

Mr. McCarthy, the previous treasurer, had done the work as a volunteer, according to FEC documents and Jennifer Crider, a senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi and spokeswoman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. She said FLS' accounting fees are in line with costs for other PACs.

The jump in rent was an adjustment to reflect San Francisco's pricey real estate market, Miss Crider said. The rent was adjusted to $1,250 per month, with $750 in back rent to reflect that the rent should have been increased in mid-2007. This was the first increase since the PAC was established in mid-1999, records show.

Over the first six months of 2008, FLS was the largest vendor for Mrs. Pelosi's PAC. Brian Wolff, a political consultant, is the second-largest vendor, bringing in $22,500 this year.

FLS' payments represent 11 percent of the $213,900 the PAC raised over the first half of this year, according to the FEC documents.

PACs, which are designed to help politicians contribute to other candidates and build influence with colleagues, operate under lighter restrictions than traditional campaign committees.

Meredith McGehee, policy director at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, said putting family members on a PAC payroll is bound to raise questions and, in some cases, allow for abuse.

"The reality is that under the current system, PACs are rife with self-dealing transactions," she said. "The laws and regulations could and should be strengthened.

"There is a point now that you're starting to talk about real money," she said of Mrs. Pelosi's PAC. "This is not just a mom-and-pop operation and any self-dealing transaction by a member of Congress is going to get scrutiny, particularly with large amounts of money and prominent members."

It is illegal for members of Congress to hire family members to work on their official staff, but hiring relatives to work on a campaign or PAC is legal.

To be sure, many political action committees employ or work with family businesses. Last year, CREW found that 19 members of Congress used campaign committees or PACs to purchase services from a family member between 2002 and 2006.

Mrs. Pelosi's PACs have been in trouble before. In 2004, one of her political action committees, Team Majority, was fined $21,000 by the FEC for accepting donations over federal limits. It was one of two PACs she operated at the same time. The Team Majority PAC was closed shortly after the fine was levied.

Related links:
• Stephen Dinan and Jennifer Harper: "Bailout" by another name sounds sweeter
• Wesley Pruden: A job for the right woman
• Hoyer, Blunt hopeful of progress on rescue bill
• Joseph Curl: Presidential hopefuls play blame game
• EDITORIAL: What is the problem?