NANCY PELOSI THE GREEN QUEEN LIES TO CHINA TO TRY AND PASS CAP AND TRADE BILL

THE CRAZY LUNATIC NANCY PELOSI IS STILL IN CHINA TRYING TO GET THEM ON BOARD WITH CAP AND TRADE SO SHE CAN GET IT PASSED HERE IN THE USA. SHE KNOWS NO ONE IS BACKING IT AS IT WILL COST EVERYONE OUT THE YING WHEN IT COMES TO ANYTHING THEY BUY. ALL THE COST WILL BE PASSED ON TO CONSUMERS AND OUR LIGHT BILLS, GAS BILLS, BOTH FOR CARS AND HEAT WIL SKY ROCKET AND PEOPLE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO PAY THEIR BILLS ANYMORE. HOW SAD WHAT THIS GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO DO TO THIS COUNTRY. FIGHT BACK PEOPLE. DON'T SIT THERE ON YOUR HANDS. WRITE, CALL, FAX LETTERS TO ALL OF YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN TH EHOUSE AND SENATE. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ALREADY. THESE PEOPLE IN CONGRESS 435 HOUSE AND 100 SENATORS ARE RUNNING OUR VERY LIVES NOW. IN A COUNTRY OF OVER 300 MILLION PEOPLE YOU MEAN TO TELL ME WE ARE GOING TO SIT BACK AND ALLOW ALL THIS BS THEY ARE TRYING TO DO TO US GO FORWARD ?



GREEN QUEEN: 'EVERY ASPECT OF OUR LIVES MUST BE SUBJECTED TO INVENTORY'










Pelosi appeals for China's help on climate change
By AUDRA ANG – 10 hours ago

BEIJING (AP) — U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged Beijing on Thursday to cooperate on climate change, calling a safe environment a basic human right.

Speaking at Beijing's elite Tsinghua University, Pelosi continued the theme of her five-day China trip — that combating global warming represented a new challenge that both governments must tackle jointly.

"We are all in this together," Pelosi told an audience of about 200 students and faculty who applauded enthusiastically throughout the 45-minute session. "The impact of climate change is a tremendous risk to the security and well-being of our countries."

Pelosi's trip has been notable for skirting human rights and the fierce public criticisms she has frequently leveled at the authoritarian government.

The trip comes as President Barack Obama's administration has emphasized climate change as a new area where the two governments can broaden already wide-ranging engagement. The two countries are the biggest emitters of the carbon gases that are causing warming temperatures. Both governments are staking out positions ahead of a meeting late this year in Copenhagen that will try to forge agreement on targets and steps to reduce carbon emissions.

In a meeting Wednesday, the head of China's national legislature, Wu Bangguo, told Pelosi that climate change was a common challenge and that Beijing stood ready to work with Washington.

Turning around her usual criticisms about human rights, Pelosi linked global warming to environmental justice, saying the right to a clean environment is also a human right.

"I do see this opportunity for climate change to be ... a game-changer," she said at Tsinghua. "It's a place where human rights — looking out for the needs of the poor in terms of climate change and healthy environment — are a human right."

To achieve this, Pelosi said governments would have to make decisions and choices based on science.

"They also have to do it with openness, transparency and accountability to the people," she said. "Everyone has to have their situation improved by it."

In answering a question from a student about how Pelosi was going to get Americans to cut back on their carbon emissions, the leading Democratic lawmaker said it was important to educate children on how to conserve energy and for citizens to build more environmentally friendly homes.

"We have so much room for improvement," she said. "Every aspect of our lives must be subjected to an inventory ... of how we are taking responsibility."

Pelosi, who arrived Sunday, brought with her five members of a House committee on energy policy and global warming. A bill that would impose the first U.S. limits on greenhouse gas emissions was approved by a House committee last week, a step being considered by the full House later this year.

Pelosi's visit is part of a flurry of contacts between Washington and Beijing that highlight their wide-ranging cooperation on issues including North Korea's nuclear program and combatting the global economic slump.

Next week, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner travels to Beijing.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hLcZ2jQ4mu4rd7XlB3hetiVn1qbAD98F32AG0

SWINE FLU STARTED AT THE START OF OBAMA PRESIDENCY !

NANCY AND FRIENDS HAVE HAD THIS SWINE FLU FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW. IT IS JUST NOW BEING PUBLICISED WORLD WIDE.












A prior Swine Flu outbreak occurred at the start of the Obama Presidency. The waste of pork in Congress has spread from the national level and is being forced upon the state level by President Obama. Conservatives in Congress have also been affected by Obama’s Swine Flu(i.e. The Stimulus Package). Many state governments are not taking precaution and willing to be tainted by the Swine Flu Stimulus Package. One state, the GREAT STATE Of TEXAS, is considering ceeding from the Union to prevent further infection of the Swine Flu Stimulus Package.
Thousands of Amercians have taken precautions through innoculating themselves with Tea on April 15th, 2009.
The Swine Flu is also known by another name: Socialism.
If you have found yourself tainted by the Obama Administration’s infection of the Swine Flu Stimulus Package, please seek immediate attention via tea parties and remembering to register to vote in the next Senate elections.
Talk radio and internet(mainly conservative radio hosts like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh or websites such as ConservativePete.wordpress.com or worldnetdaily.com) will keep you up to date on how to prevent the infection of the Swine Flu/Socialism.
Related article: http://www.ridiculopathy

ARE YOU KIDDING ME ? NANCY PELOSI IS A HYPOCRITE!

YOU HAVE GO TO BE KIDDING ME. Congress and NANCY PELOSI PUKE FACE (HYPOCRITE) HAS THE DAMN NERVE TO TALK ABOUT AGI AND OTHERS SQUANDERING THE PEOPLE'S MONEY.
WHAT THE F ! YOU PIECES OF TRASH JUST PASSED BILLS SPENDING TRILLIONS OF THE PEOPLES MONEY ON YOU PET PROJECTS AND YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO SAY THIS. GIVE ME A BREAK. YOU LYING PIECE OF GARBAGE. RESIGN NOW ! ALL OF YOU CREEPS. TAX CHEATS LIARS AND PURE SCUM OF THE EARTH ARE RUNNING AMERICA AMUCK.

AGI, FANNIE MAE, AND FREDDIE MAC AND ALL THE REST OF THE CHEATS ON WALL STREET ARE ANGELS COMPARED TO WHAT THE HELL YOU PEOPLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS ARE DOING TO AMERICANS. CLEAN UP YOUR OWN YARD BEFORE YOU GO CLEANING UP SOMEONES ELSES !



WASHINGTON (AP) -- Denouncing a "squandering of the people's money," lawmakers voted decisively Thursday to impose a 90 percent tax on millions of dollars in employee bonuses paid by troubled insurance giant AIG and other bailed-out companies.
Those people are good folks compared to all of you liars and tax cheats running our goverenment now. AMERICA HAS NO MORALS ANYMORE. WHY ?? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON ?

Nancy Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds, $99,000

YEAH NANCY YOU ARE CROOK TOO ! BUT, HEY THATS OKAY, RIGHT ?.. YOU ARE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE ! LOL
APPARENTLY YOU TEED SOMEONE OFF NANCY AND DID NOT DO SOMETHING THEY ASKED YOU TO DO FOR THEM AND THEY GOT MAD AND EXPOSED YOU. POLITICS. THAT'S THE WAY IT IS NANCY. SORRY. LMAO







EXCLUSIVE:
Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees

Wednesday, October 1, 2008


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she supported banning last year.

Financial Leasing Services Inc. (FLS), owned by Paul F. Pelosi, has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's "PAC to the Future" over the PAC's nine-year history.

The payments have quadrupled since Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer of his wife's committee in 2007, Federal Election Commission records show. FLS is on track to take in $48,000 in payments this year alone - eight times as much as it received annually from 2000 to 2005, when the committee was run by another treasurer.

Lawmakers' frequent use of campaign donations to pay relatives emerged as an issue in the 2006 election campaigns, when the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal gave Democrats fodder to criticize Republicans such as former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas and Rep. John T. Doolittle of California for putting their wives on their campaign and PAC payrolls for fundraising work.

Last year, Mrs. Pelosi supported a bill that would have banned members of Congress from putting spouses on their campaign staffs. The bill - which passed the House in a voice vote but did not get out of a Senate committee - banned not only direct payments by congressional campaign committees and PACs to spouses for services including consulting and fundraising, but also "indirect compensation," such as payments to companies that employ spouses.

"Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time. "Congressman [Adam] Schiff's bill will help us accomplish that goal by increasing transparency in election campaigns and preventing the misuse of funds."

Last week, Mrs. Pelosi's office said the payments to her husband's firm were perfectly legal, insisting she is compensating her husband at fair market value for the work his firm has performed for the PAC. But ethical watchdogs said the arrangement sends the wrong message.

"It's problematic," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonprofit ethics and watchdog group. "From what I understand, Mr. Pelosi doesn't need the money, but this isn't the issue. ... As speaker of the House, it sends the wrong message. She shouldn't be putting family members on the payroll."

A senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi described the payments to FLS as "business expenses."

"Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time. "Congressman [Adam] Schiff's bill will help us accomplish that goal by increasing transparency in election campaigns and preventing the misuse of funds."

Last week, Mrs. Pelosi's office said the payments to her husband's firm were perfectly legal, insisting she is compensating her husband at fair market value for the work his firm has performed for the PAC. But ethical watchdogs said the arrangement sends the wrong message.

"It's problematic," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonprofit ethics and watchdog group. "From what I understand, Mr. Pelosi doesn't need the money, but this isn't the issue. ... As speaker of the House, it sends the wrong message. She shouldn't be putting family members on the payroll."

A senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi described the payments to FLS as "business expenses."

"She's followed all the appropriate rules and regulations in terms of records and paperwork," said Brendan Daly, Mrs. Pelosi's spokesman. "When [former treasurer] Leo McCarthy became ill, she thought that it was best that that firm did the accounting and she's paid fair market value in San Francisco."

Between 1999 and 2006, FLS collected $500 per month to cover rent, utilities and equipment for the leadership PAC, according to the FEC records. The PAC's address is listed as a personal mailbox in San Francisco, across the street from FLS's Montgomery Street office building, but the rent payments went to an office space.

In early 2007, the PAC's treasurer, Leo T. McCarthy, former Democratic speaker of the state assembly and lieutenant governor in California, died. Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer and his company's PAC payouts rose.

At that point, FLS started charging the PAC $24,000 per year for accounting work. In January 2008, the PAC's rent - paid to FLS - also quadrupled from $500 to $2,000 per month.

Katie Falkenberg/The Washington Times PARTNERSHIP: Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul F. Pelosi, was by her side at a Democratic event in 2006.

Mr. McCarthy, the previous treasurer, had done the work as a volunteer, according to FEC documents and Jennifer Crider, a senior adviser to Mrs. Pelosi and spokeswoman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. She said FLS' accounting fees are in line with costs for other PACs.

The jump in rent was an adjustment to reflect San Francisco's pricey real estate market, Miss Crider said. The rent was adjusted to $1,250 per month, with $750 in back rent to reflect that the rent should have been increased in mid-2007. This was the first increase since the PAC was established in mid-1999, records show.

Over the first six months of 2008, FLS was the largest vendor for Mrs. Pelosi's PAC. Brian Wolff, a political consultant, is the second-largest vendor, bringing in $22,500 this year.

FLS' payments represent 11 percent of the $213,900 the PAC raised over the first half of this year, according to the FEC documents.

PACs, which are designed to help politicians contribute to other candidates and build influence with colleagues, operate under lighter restrictions than traditional campaign committees.

Meredith McGehee, policy director at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, said putting family members on a PAC payroll is bound to raise questions and, in some cases, allow for abuse.

"The reality is that under the current system, PACs are rife with self-dealing transactions," she said. "The laws and regulations could and should be strengthened.

"There is a point now that you're starting to talk about real money," she said of Mrs. Pelosi's PAC. "This is not just a mom-and-pop operation and any self-dealing transaction by a member of Congress is going to get scrutiny, particularly with large amounts of money and prominent members."

It is illegal for members of Congress to hire family members to work on their official staff, but hiring relatives to work on a campaign or PAC is legal.

To be sure, many political action committees employ or work with family businesses. Last year, CREW found that 19 members of Congress used campaign committees or PACs to purchase services from a family member between 2002 and 2006.

Mrs. Pelosi's PACs have been in trouble before. In 2004, one of her political action committees, Team Majority, was fined $21,000 by the FEC for accepting donations over federal limits. It was one of two PACs she operated at the same time. The Team Majority PAC was closed shortly after the fine was levied.

Related links:
• Stephen Dinan and Jennifer Harper: "Bailout" by another name sounds sweeter
• Wesley Pruden: A job for the right woman
• Hoyer, Blunt hopeful of progress on rescue bill
• Joseph Curl: Presidential hopefuls play blame game
• EDITORIAL: What is the problem?