VOTE NO TO OBAMA~PLEASE THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE~THIS IS DANGEROUS!

I can only hope and "pray" really hard that when people go to the polls on November 4the, 2008 that they ill think really hard about what is a stake in this very important election. It is not a white or black issue, it is a moral issue.

I know that the majority of Americans surely have to have some kind of normal brain up there. I know that all the worshippers of Obama are not the kind of folks that use the one God gave them. They are either blacks, nut cases or followers of one another...Like you know, just because he is black is why they are voting for him, or they are either, very uneducated or white trailer trash and are looking for a handout so they want have to get off their fat sorry asses and get a damn job.
You know the kind. Food stamps, welfare checks, WIC. Oh and the one ones that take kids in their homes as foster kids and get money from the government or the ones that keep having kids out of wedlock so they can get a larger welfare check every month. You get my point. It goes on and on and there are many. If any of this makes you mad then I am sorry. It is the truth. PROVE ME WRONG.!!

The house and the senate are totally out of control and they need to all be replaced.
If people would vote against every incumbant that they know to be corrupt it would be a much better group of people for a while at least until they get corrupted. LOL.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html
In the Wall Street Journal today.

A Liberal Supermajority
Get ready for 'change' we haven't seen since 1965, or 1933.

If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.

Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven't since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.

The nearby table shows the major bills that passed the House this year or last before being stopped by the Senate minority. Keep in mind that the most important power of the filibuster is to shape legislation, not merely to block it. The threat of 41 committed Senators can cause the House to modify its desires even before legislation comes to a vote. Without that restraining power, all of the following have very good chances of becoming law in 2009 or 2010.

- Medicare for all. When HillaryCare cratered in 1994, the Democrats concluded they had overreached, so they carved up the old agenda into smaller incremental steps, such as Schip for children. A strongly Democratic Congress is now likely to lay the final flagstones on the path to government-run health insurance from cradle to grave.

Mr. Obama wants to build a public insurance program, modeled after Medicare and open to everyone of any income. According to the Lewin Group, the gold standard of health policy analysis, the Obama plan would shift between 32 million and 52 million from private coverage to the huge new entitlement. Like Medicare or the Canadian system, this would never be repealed.

The commitments would start slow, so as not to cause immediate alarm. But as U.S. health-care spending flowed into the default government options, taxes would have to rise or services would be rationed, or both. Single payer is the inevitable next step, as Mr. Obama has already said is his ultimate ideal.

- The business climate. "We have some harsh decisions to make," Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned recently, speaking about retribution for the financial panic. Look for a replay of the Pecora hearings of the 1930s, with Henry Waxman, John Conyers and Ed Markey sponsoring ritual hangings to further their agenda to control more of the private economy. The financial industry will get an overhaul in any case, but telecom, biotech and drug makers, among many others, can expect to be investigated and face new, more onerous rules. See the "Issues and Legislation" tab on Mr. Waxman's Web site for a not-so-brief target list.

The danger is that Democrats could cause the economic downturn to last longer than it otherwise will by enacting regulatory overkill like Sarbanes-Oxley. Something more punitive is likely as well, for instance a windfall profits tax on oil, and maybe other industries.

- Union supremacy. One program certain to be given right of way is "card check." Unions have been in decline for decades, now claiming only 7.4% of the private-sector work force, so Big Labor wants to trash the secret-ballot elections that have been in place since the 1930s. The "Employee Free Choice Act" would convert workplaces into union shops merely by gathering signatures from a majority of employees, which means organizers could strongarm those who opposed such a petition.

The bill also imposes a compulsory arbitration regime that results in an automatic two-year union "contract" after 130 days of failed negotiation. The point is to force businesses to recognize a union whether the workers support it or not. This would be the biggest pro-union shift in the balance of labor-management power since the Wagner Act of 1935.

- Taxes. Taxes will rise substantially, the only question being how high. Mr. Obama would raise the top income, dividend and capital-gains rates for "the rich," substantially increasing the cost of new investment in the U.S. More radically, he wants to lift or eliminate the cap on income subject to payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security. This would convert what was meant to be a pension insurance program into an overt income redistribution program. It would also impose a probably unrepealable increase in marginal tax rates, and a permanent shift upward in the federal tax share of GDP.

- The green revolution. A tax-and-regulation scheme in the name of climate change is a top left-wing priority. Cap and trade would hand Congress trillions of dollars in new spending from the auction of carbon credits, which it would use to pick winners and losers in the energy business and across the economy. Huge chunks of GDP and millions of jobs would be at the mercy of Congress and a vast new global-warming bureaucracy. Without the GOP votes to help stage a filibuster, Senators from carbon-intensive states would have less ability to temper coastal liberals who answer to the green elites.

- Free speech and voting rights. A liberal supermajority would move quickly to impose procedural advantages that could cement Democratic rule for years to come. One early effort would be national, election-day voter registration. This is a long-time goal of Acorn and others on the "community organizer" left and would make it far easier to stack the voter rolls. The District of Columbia would also get votes in Congress -- Democratic, naturally.

Felons may also get the right to vote nationwide, while the Fairness Doctrine is likely to be reimposed either by Congress or the Obama FCC. A major goal of the supermajority left would be to shut down talk radio and other voices of political opposition.

- Special-interest potpourri. Look for the watering down of No Child Left Behind testing standards, as a favor to the National Education Association. The tort bar's ship would also come in, including limits on arbitration to settle disputes and watering down the 1995 law limiting strike suits. New causes of legal action would be sprinkled throughout most legislation. The anti-antiterror lobby would be rewarded with the end of Guantanamo and military commissions, which probably means trying terrorists in civilian courts. Google and MoveOn.org would get "net neutrality" rules, subjecting the Internet to intrusive regulation for the first time.

It's always possible that events -- such as a recession -- would temper some of these ambitions. Republicans also feared the worst in 1993 when Democrats ran the entire government, but it didn't turn out that way. On the other hand, Bob Dole then had 43 GOP Senators to support a filibuster, and the entire Democratic Party has since moved sharply to the left. Mr. Obama's agenda is far more liberal than Bill Clinton's was in 1992, and the Southern Democrats who killed Al Gore's BTU tax and modified liberal ambitions are long gone.

In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today's left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for "change" should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.

WHY ARE YOU NOT VOTING FOR McCain/Palin in 08 ?

This is a poll. I am trying to gather information from everyday people as to "why" if you are not voting for McCain.
I want to know why you will not vote for John McCain if that is the case.
Please leave a comment.
Thanks !

Barack Hussien Obama is Hiding a Radical Past !

Did you know that Barack Obama was affiliated with a leading national socialist party? Barack Obama didn’t include in his 2008 resume that he entered politics in the mid-1990s endorsed by Chicago’s leading socialists. This just keeps getting better and better. Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America.

1.Barack Obama attended and participated in meetings of the Chicago New Party and the Chicago DSA, the local affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America.

2.Barack Obama sought the endorsement of the Chicago DSA which required rigorous scrutiny by the party’s Political Committee as well as Mr. Obama’s signature on a contract promising “a visible and active relationship with the NP.”

3.Barack Obama actively used the endorsement from the Chicago DSA.

4.Barack Obama won his DSA-endorsed and -backed campaign to secure his seat in the Illinois State Senate.

5.Barack Obama continued his involvement with the Chicago DSA — including directly asking the group to join “his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration” — and received their endorsements in subsequent campaigns.

Obama’s participation in and endorsement from the Chicago New Party and Chicago DSA, the local affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America (which is the U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International) is quite clear:

1.According to the write-up on the July 1995 meeting of Chicago DSA and New Party membership, Barack Obama was one of about 50 people attending out of their then-300 member local group. Other documents below will demonstrate Barack Obama attended and participated in subsequent meetings.

2.The New Party rigorously evaluated its candidate endorsements and claimed “a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections.” This was no passive endorsement.

Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.—New Ground

3.Candidate Barack Obama participated as a panelist at the DSA-sponsored Town Meeting on February 25, 1996, entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America”. As reported in New Ground,

Barack Obama observed that Martin Luther King’s March on Washington in the 1960s wasn’t simply about civil rights but demanded jobs as well. Now the issue is again coming to the front, but he wished the issue was on the Democratic agenda not just on Buchanan’s.

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign is “what does it take to create productive communities”, not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.

The first is “human capital development”. By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a “workforce preparation strategy”. Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it’s also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the “social wage” approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By “workforce preparation strategy”, Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.

The state government can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts.

4.Obama subsequently secured his endorsement from the Chicago DSAThe local Democratic Socialists of America affiliate issued their Chicago DSA Endorsements in the March 19th Primary Election:

Barack Obama is running to gain the Democratic ballot line for Illinois Senate 13th District. The 13th District is Alice Palmer’s old district, encompassing parts of Hyde Park and South Shore.

Mr. Obama graduated from Columbia University and promptly went into community organizing for the Developing Communities Project in Roseland and Altgeld Gardens on the far south side of Chicago. He went on to Harvard University, where he was editor of the Harvard Law Review. He graduated with a law degree. In 1992, he was Director of Illinois Project Vote, a voter registration campaign that made Carol Moseley Braun’s election to the U.S. Senate much easier than it would have been. At present, he practices law in Judson Miner’s law firm and is President of the board of the Annenberg Challenge Grant which is distributing some $50 million in grants to public school reform efforts.

What best characterizes Barack Obama is a quote from an article in Illinois Issues, a retrospective look at his experience as a community organizer while he was completing his degree at Harvard:

“… community organizations and organizers are hampered by their own dogmas about the style and substance of organizing. Most practice … a ‘consumer advocacy’ approach, with a focus on wrestling services and resources from outside powers that be. Few are thinking of harnessing the internal productive capacities, both in terms of money and people, that already exist in communities.” (Illinois issues, September, 1988)

Luckily, Mr. Obama does not have any opposition in the primary. His opponents have all dropped out or were ruled off the ballot.

5.Barack Obama Continued Attending Membership Meetings of the Chicago DSA New PartyObama attended membership meeting on April 11, 1996 where he expressed his gratitude for their support. The report shared that “Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration.”

6.Obama won his election with the help of the Chicago DSA’s New Party.

7.Chicago DSA notes in 1998 that Barack Obama eulogized Saul Mendelson, co-founder of the Debs Dinner.

8.In the fall of 1998, Chicago DSA’s New Ground’s editor offered nomination of Barack Obama for reelection.

9.When Barack Obama challenged Bobby Rush for the 1st Congressional District in 2000, the Chicago DSA opted to recommend both:

For Congressman of the 1st Congressional District, the Executive Committee was faced with two very good candidates. As we are not making endorsements but merely recommendations, we felt no conflict in recommending both Bobby Rush and Barack Obama.

Bobby Rush was the incumbent Congressman. He was also a candidate for Mayor of Chicago in the last municipal elections, endorsed by Chicago DSA. While he hasn’t always been the ideal Congressman from a left perspective (being a cosponsor of the “NAFTA for Africa” bill, for example), he’s generally been quite good. To volunteer, call 773 264 7874. Contributions may be made to Citizens for Rush, 514 E. 95th St., Chicago, IL 60619.

Barack Obama is serving only his second term in the Illinois State Senate so he might be fairly charged with ambition, but the same might have be said of Bobby Rush when he ran against Congressman Charles Hayes. Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy.

Conclusion:
Barack Obama has a long-term and sustained relationship with the Chicago DSA, an affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America, and with the Chicago New Party. He participated in multiple membership meetings and in DSA-sponsored events, repeatedly sought their endorsement. This does not answer all questions about Barack Obama’s past relationships with multiple socialist groups. What the media need to find out is this: Has Barack Obama broken his ties with them> If so, when and why?

Lies, Loopholes and the Constitution~ JUST SAY NO TO OBAMA

I saw this response SOMEONE WROTE to an article and I THOUGHT I WOULD SHARE ONES OPINION. I agree 100%

Lies, Loopholes and the Constitution:
Political


In response to a concerned fellow American over the liberal “Presenters” of the Presidential debates and the “obvious” hatred/fear emanating from our fellow Americans who have turned Left somewhere along the road…No my friend...we won't have gridlock if Obama is elected....but rather a dynasty of destruction in which every Liberal spending Bill submitted by Congress will be approved by Osama and Obama (not to mention the endorsements of the primarily Socialist leaders in Germany, France, GB, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea (no fewer than six politicians running for office in South America have officially renamed themselves to Barack Obama..) oh yeah....and all of the wannabe future Muslim Caliphate members from Gibraltar to India that herald the coming new friendship with the "Enlightened One"! Has it ever occurred to people like Charles Gibson to ask Obama why all of his closest friends are either convicted criminals (Chicagoan Tony Resco), self admitted Homeland Anti-American Terrorists like William Ayers & wife, or his own lobbyist top election staff chairpersons such as the former KEY FIGURES of none other than the recently exposed government sponsored companies (Fanny Mae, Freddy Mac and let us not forget....the largest of the three...AIG...so help me GOD)! While shaming President Bush and John McCain for not providing "proper and lasting oversight of this country's fraudulent mortgage brokerage and lending firms" And he has the "Audacity of Hope" that the true content of his private and uplifting "spiritual guidance sessions" with the racist Hate Monger "reverend" Wright will continue to go "unnoticed" by his worshippers like Okra Wimpey, and the producers, and faithful staff at NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and the public sponsored C-Span as well as the nationwide "Politbureau/educational" stations that are nothing more than Socialist training videos produced and broadcast by those in direct alignment and consultation with the Annenberg Foundation! Oh and let us not forget his favorite "mentor and travelling companion" to accompany him to certain "God-fearing" Mideastern nations like Libya to meet with that kind fellow Mohammar Khadafy??

Has it ever occurred to any of the "fair and balanced" minded Americans that his highly valued (and widely acclaimed) duties as a "Community Organizer" were nothing more than frequent and undisclosed (to the general voting populace) visits to the Churches of the concerned faithful in South Chicago in order to convince the "ministers" of the community to "organize" as a large and vocal voting block for the only folks that could "Feel their Pain" (a political move directly from the playbook of the widely acclaimed Socialist and Communist faithful Saul Alinsky)?? And as he, his Network friends and campaign faithful touted his important "Executive" experience as a selfless effort to gain favor ($$$) and status as someone in the community who came from a Holy place to organize, stress Unity of, and help to bring focus to at least those most helpless members of the local "Black" community and to "Liberate" them from the centuries of tortuous conditions the "White Man" had forced upon them through the enlightening "Truths" of "Theology" perhaps???!

My friend, that is just the "tip of the iceberg" when it comes to "getting to know" this kind, upstanding and patriotic man known as "Obama", no, actually the tip of one of many "icebergs" floating around this Globe, with mock concern that they will be "melting soon" anyway due to the "global warming" bunch of non-caring Conservatives who pollute the planet more with every new energy plant (including private business) that they start up. The "out of touch" compassionless Americans who are so self gratifying that we turn up our thermostats in the Winter and lower them in Summer for nothing more than to satisfy our all-consuming lust for comfort! Folks like us who are so unsophisticated intellectually that we can't see the solution to the serious energy crisis like inflating all of our tires for the sake of the Globe! Undisciplined and backward thinking masses as we look at the world around us with envy and are driven to the verge of madness as we pick up our guns and hold onto the false security offered by our own family Bibles! If only we could figure out a way, we could cast away those guns & reading materials and learn to live happily and "peacefully co-exist" side by side with knowledgeable people like those good kind folks in the more "sophisticated" bastions of highly evolved civilization like Metro New York....or hopefully...maybe those wise souls in South Chicago!! We could get good paying jobs or government college loans if we could be lucky enough to be selected to build some of those new windmills of the shores of Long Island, or in the seas near Boston (did you say that would conflict with Senator Teddy's aesthetically pleasing view of the Harbor Horizon?? Well maybe not Boston then).

WHY SHOULD WE BE SO CONCERNED ABOUT A COOL EDUCATED DUDE THAT COULD AT ONE TIME SNORT AN EIGHTBALL ON THE WAY TO THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICE FOR SUPPORT OF HIGHER EDUCATION?? Certain political machines remind us of that old quote "If power is the primary source of corruption then total power leads to total corruption" ever read clauses 1 and 2 of Article VI of our very own US Constitution?? It is as follows:

Article. VI.

Clause 1: All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yep, for the "un-initiated" and "un-anointed" among us, those two short clauses mean that within the framework of our US Constitution, the Founders provided an instrument for providing other nations with the security of knowing that, if we ever agree to a treaty with that nation (or even a united group of nations), then we are bound to honor the laws and agreements of that instrument....EVEN PUTTING THOSE AGREEMENTS ABOVE THOSE RIGHTS OR RESTRICTIONS guaranteed us in our very own US Constitution!! Well...I'm no Plato...but I vaguely recall recent mention by many representatives of other nations, as well as some of our own illustrative members of Con-Digress, that one of the main tenants of the group of Global Elitists known as the UN, is the firm conviction that in the "modern" world, and in consideration of the many various "war-like" factions among the populace of sovereign nations, the best method (by consensus) of maintaining the "economic viability and social stability" of those populations is to ban the possession, ownership or private sales of weapons considered as "small arms" whose definition conveniently would be determined by those honorable and "enlightened few".

Now, ask me, if after what passes for a candidate of "presidential aspiration" can have even the most relative and telling indicators of his political life completely overlooked and determined by his followers (sponsors) to be a mean spirited attempt by conservative right-wing hit men, and highly praised as the only qualified "Agent of Change" we can trust....well.

If Obama were to become our next President, Congress would be totally controlled by liberals with the "most liberal member of the US Senate" at the helm of this "Pirate Ship" to sign off on and give the final seal of approval to ANY International Treaties designed as a "vehicle of change" in accordance with Article VI of that GOD inspired sacred document that may even now be under the cloud of darkness and deceit by the "New Messiah". And just how in the Hell can we mistrust an honest soul who has been officially and enthusiastically endorsed by Okra Wimpey herself!! Watch out Queen Latifah....Michelle is waiting in the wings!!

As I write this even now, in final (thank Goodness), there is a breaking news story from the Information Minister of the new IRAQI government saying that, when Obama met with the Iraqi ambassador recently, he was "adamantly persuading" the Iraqi Ambassador NOT to sign a withdrawal Treaty issued by the Bush Administration but that it would be best for both of our Nations and the World at large, if the Iraqi President Malachi would postpone his decisions on American Force withdrawals until the new leader of the next new Administration is officially elected and seated!! If confirmed....wouldn't this fall under the Treason Statutes?? Can a private citizen or individual member of the Senate use his position to try to influence the troop deployment decisions with the leader of the nation in which those troops are actively deployed, and at such a time when we are technically "at war" with remaining factions still in that nation (though admittedly at the request and with the hospitality of the foreign leader)?? Why does this news not surprise me, and why does it not surprise me that the only network to mention this Iraqi Minister's allegations has been the Fox News Channel (in a live televised interview with the minister making the accusations).

As I close...I have to say that I am certainly not qualified nor would I care to pass "Judgement" on Senators Obama, McCain, Biden, nor Governor Palin....I am sure that senator Obama is a man of conscious and deep and often reflections. I also know he is a family man who is aquainted with the hopes, fears and ambition we all share as people of the same "global family" He is also not different than my self on many of his stated "core beliefs anf feelings" and my life has been a lot more parallel to his own than to Senator McCains ( I was an anti-conservative, pot and hash smoking, long haired anti-war idealist protestor in my late teens/early twenties who served 5 years for drug possession in the late sixties/ early seventies, and can't claim the Honor of giving military service to my own country during the last phases of Vietnam War. My concerns are purely "tainted" by my now Conservative "Worldview" or my obvious desire to point out only those positions & facts about the political candidate I find "most disengenuous", and I am 100% certain that I have been guilty of all of the 7 deadly sins (greed, jealousy, avarice, sloth...etc..etc.) at various times in my own sometimes confused life....but I feel like after all of the unfounded, slanderous, viscious and pretentious accusations and media attempts to assasinate the Honor and Character of Senator McCain and his Vice-presidential nominee's character and unfair exploration and "exploitation" of their sacred trust in the right of most personal privacy and dignity, a few facts to help "balance the scales" were in order. The facts in this blog are merely facts based on either historical records or documented evidence, but in excercising my right to free speech & freedom of expression....the rest is obviously personal opinion. We can debate the facts...and share opinions...but I hope we never try to hide the "Truth".

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”

Plato quote

“In politics we presume that everyone who knows how to get votes knows how to administer a city or a state. When we are ill... we do not ask for the handsomest physician, or the most eloquent one.”

Plato quote

The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness...This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.

Plato quote


God Bless us All and Protect us, both Liberal and Conservative